Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses

16 references·14 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises7,230 cited
1946Forming impressions of personality.2,693 cited
2015What is an emerging technology?987 cited
1995Foresight in science and technology556 cited
1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact448 cited
1997How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model402 cited
2013Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties318 cited
2011What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?242 cited
2017Early identification of emerging technologies: A machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators230 cited
1980Unintelligible Management Research and Academic Prestige208 cited
2009Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features179 cited
2016Monitoring emerging technologies for technology planning using technical keyword based analysis from patent data159 cited
2018Identifying and monitoring the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and Twitter data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology154 cited
1994On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

141 cited

2017Forecasting emerging technologies: A supervised learning approach through patent analysis140 cited

2015The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy113 cited

Cited by

2025Digital technologies and sustainability accounting, reporting and assurance: framework and research opportunities38 cited
2024Can ChatGPT be used to predict citation counts, readership, and social media interaction? An exploration among 2222 scientific abstracts34 cited
2025Examining the impact of digital transformation on digital product innovation performance in banking industry through the integration of resource-based view and dynamic capabilities34 cited
2024Effects of research funding on the academic impact and societal visibility of scientific research32 cited
2024Decoding the writing styles of disciplines: A large-scale quantitative analysis25 cited
2023Understanding writing styles of scientific papers in the IS-LS domain: Evidence from abstracts over the past three decades25 cited
2024Online attention versus knowledge utilization: Exploring how linguistic features of scientific papers influence knowledge diffusion21 cited
2024Scientific impact analysis: Unraveling the link between linguistic properties and citations21 cited
2024Content-based quality evaluation of scientific papers using coarse feature and knowledge entity network17 cited
2023Expedited editorial decision in COVID-19 pandemic12 cited
2023Transparency of reporting practices in quantitative field studies: The transparency sweet spot for article citations12 cited
2025Exploring the change in scientific readability following the release of ChatGPT9 cited
2024The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact8 cited
2024How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications6 cited