SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design
3 references·6 citing·32 second hop
Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design (2017)Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Crit…Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)Scientific method: Statistica…Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patient Outcomes After Craniotomy for Tumor in Adult Patients in the United States, 1988–2004 (2010)Racial, Ethnic, and Socioecon…Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data (2010)Development and use of report…Time trend analysis of database and registry use in the neurosurgical literature: evidence for the advance of registry science (2021)Time trend analysis of databa…Increases in female academic productivity and female mentorship highlight sustained progress in previously identified neurosurgical gender disparities (2021)Increases in female academic …Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal (2019)Reporting Methodology of Neur…Big Data Research in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Content, Statistical Output, and Bibliometric Analysis (2019)Big Data Research in Pediatri…Big Data Defined: A Practical Review for Neurosurgeons (2019)Big Data Defined: A Practical…In Reply: Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design (2018)In Reply: Big Data Research i…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines (2015)Das RECORD-Statement zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden (2016)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The fickle P value generates irreproducible results (2015)GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)Disparities in Health Care by Race, Ethnicity, and Language Among the Insured (2002)Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care (2003)Primary Care Physicians Who Treat Blacks and Whites (2004)Setting a National Agenda for Surgical Disparities Research (2016)Surgical Disparities: A Comprehensive Review and New Conceptual Framework (2016)Disparities in Surgical Access: A Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Model, and Evidence Map (2019)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value Is Not Enough (2012)The 100 Most Influential Publications on Medulloblastoma: Areas of Past, Current, and Future Focus (2020)Microvascular Decompression: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles (2022)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Increasing Womenʼs Leadership in Academic Medicine (2002)The future of neurosurgery: a white paper on the recruitment and retention of women in neurosurgery (2008)Women Underrepresented on Editorial Boards of 60 Major Medical Journals (2011)Analysis of authorship trends in vascular surgery demonstrates a sticky surgical floor for women (2021)Authorship Trends and Disparities in Cardiothoracic Surgery (2022)Representation of female neurosurgeons as abstract authors at neurological surgery conferences (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Scientific method: Statistical errors1,536 cited
  • 2010Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data367 cited
  • 2010Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patient Outcomes After Craniotomy for Tumor in Adult Patients in the United States, 1988–2004200 cited

Cited by

  • 2018In Reply: Big Data Research in Neurosurgery: A Critical Look at this Popular New Study Design41 cited
  • 2021Increases in female academic productivity and female mentorship highlight sustained progress in previously identified neurosurgical gender disparities40 cited
  • 2019Big Data Defined: A Practical Review for Neurosurgeons29 cited
  • 2019Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal28 cited
  • 2019Big Data Research in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Content, Statistical Output, and Bibliometric Analysis24 cited
  • 2021Time trend analysis of database and registry use in the neurosurgical literature: evidence for the advance of registry science15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work