SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analysis of Free Browser-based Accessibility Tools: WCAG 2.1 Evaluation of Mississippi Gulf Coast Public Library Websites
7 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Analysis of Free Browser-based Accessibility Tools: WCAG 2.1 Evaluation of Mississippi Gulf Coast Public Library Websites (2021)Analysis of Free Browser-based Accessibil…Evaluating the web accessibility of IIT libraries: a study of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (2020)Evaluating the web accessibil…Comparing Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and Evaluating the Accessibility of Webpages: Proposed Frameworks (2020)Comparing Web Accessibility E…WCAG 2.1 and the Current State of Web Accessibility in Libraries (2019)WCAG 2.1 and the Current Stat…A Heuristic Method to Evaluate Web Accessibility for Users With Low Vision (2019)A Heuristic Method to Evaluat…Implementing Recommendations From Web Accessibility Guidelines: A Comparative Study of Nondisabled Users and Users With Visual Impairments (2017)Implementing Recommendations …A Practical Guide to Improving Web Accessibility (2017)A Practical Guide to Improvin…Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: a study of 50 homepages (2003)Web accessibility in the Mid-…Enhancing Web Accessibility - Navigating the Upgrade of Design Systems from WCAG 2.0 to WCAG 2.1 (2024)Enhancing Web Accessibility -…Barriers to use (2000)Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities (2000)An empirical investigation into the difficulties experienced by visually impaired Internet users (2007)Developing Online Community Accessibility Guidelines for Persons With Disabilities and Older Adults (2008)Accessibility, usability, quality performance, and readability evaluation of university websites of Turkey: a comparative study of state and private universities (2020)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research (1988)Accessibility of South African university websites (2018)Easy-to-read language in disability-friendly web sites: Effects on nondisabled users (2018)Salient beliefs influencing the intention to consider Web Accessibility (2018)Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 (2001)Is your web page accessible? (2005)Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools (2013)Combined Method for Evaluating Accessibility in Serious Games (2020)Accessibility challenges of e-commerce websites (2022)Accessibility engineering in web evaluation process: a systematic literature review (2023)e-Government Website Accessibility: In-Depth Evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman (2005)The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites (2007)Comparing ten WCAG tools for accessibility evaluation of websites (2021)Assessing the accessibility and usability of Malaysia Higher Education Website (2010)Egovernment and web accessibility in South America (2014)Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: A case study of college websites (2019)Evaluating web accessibility of educational institutions websites using a variable magnitude approach (2021)Web accessibility performance analysis using web content accessibility guidelines and automated tools: a systematic literature review (2022)Accessibility Academy: Interactive Learning of the WCAG 2.1 Web Accessibility Guidelines (2024)Tools for Web Accessibility Evaluation (2019)Accessibility of university websites worldwide: a systematic literature review (2021)Rich Screen Reader Experiences for Accessible Data Visualization (2022)Trends and best practices for ensuring digital accessibility in the workplace (2025)Digital Accessibility and Institutional Empathy (2026)Digital Accommodations for Students Living with Print Disabilities: A Literature Review (2020)Diretrizes para o design de interfaces de Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem voltadas a usuários com baixa visão (2021)How to Audit Your Library Website for WCAG 2.1 Compliance (2021)WAccess -- A Web Accessibility Tool based on WCAG 2.2, 2.1 and 2.0 Guidelines (2021)More to Do than Can Ever Be Done: Reconciling Library Online Learning Objects with WCAG 2.1 Standards for Accessibility (2022)Academic libraries and their legal obligation for content accessibility (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: a study of 50 homepages106 cited
  • 2020Comparing Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and Evaluating the Accessibility of Webpages: Proposed Frameworks101 cited
  • 2019A Heuristic Method to Evaluate Web Accessibility for Users With Low Vision78 cited
  • 2017Implementing Recommendations From Web Accessibility Guidelines: A Comparative Study of Nondisabled Users and Users With Visual Impairments53 cited
  • 2019WCAG 2.1 and the Current State of Web Accessibility in Libraries30 cited
  • 2020Evaluating the web accessibility of IIT libraries: a study of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines29 cited
  • 2017A Practical Guide to Improving Web Accessibility11 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Enhancing Web Accessibility - Navigating the Upgrade of Design Systems from WCAG 2.0 to WCAG 2.15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work