Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Environmental taxes, technology innovation quality and firm performance in China—A test of effects based on the Porter hypothesis

16 references·16 citing·40 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship13,329 cited
1998Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data6,815 cited
1995Green and competitive: ending the stalemate4,209 cited
2012The environment and directed technical change3,771 cited
1997Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study2,196 cited
2013The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?1,923 cited
2003Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries1,591 cited
1999Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed1,446 cited
2015Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors1,045 cited
2016Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms866 cited
2001Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Evidence from Oil Refineries753 cited
2011The Illusion of Statistical Control671 cited
2013Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs616 cited
2019Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

582 cited

2006Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries549 cited

2018Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies410 cited

Cited by

2023How does environmental regulation affect real green technology innovation and strategic green technology innovation?146 cited
2023Impact of environmental tax on pollution control: A sustainable development perspective105 cited
2023Environmental quality and sustainability: exploring the role of environmental taxes, environment-related technologies, and R&D expenditure85 cited
2022The Influence of the Policy of Replacing Environmental Protection Fees with Taxes on Enterprise Green Innovation—Evidence from China’s Heavily Polluting Industries73 cited
2023How does environmental tax affect enterprises’ total factor productivity? Evidence from the reform of environmental fee-to-tax in China69 cited
2024Promoting green technology innovation through policy synergy: Evidence from the dual pilot policy of low-carbon city and innovative city68 cited
2022Low-Carbon Transition and Green Innovation: Evidence from Pilot Cities in China67 cited
2024The Impact of Green Innovation on Corporate Performance: An Analysis Based on Substantive and Strategic Green Innovations55 cited
2024Effects of China's low carbon pilot city policy on corporate green innovation: Considering the mediating role of public environmental concern53 cited
2024Green public procurement and corporate environmental performance: An empirical analysis based on data from green procurement contracts49 cited
2023The Impact of Environmental Tax and R&D Tax Incentives on Green Innovation46 cited
2024Low-carbon city pilot policy and enterprise low-carbon innovation–A quasi-natural experiment from China46 cited
2024The effect of green innovation on corporate financial performance: Does quality matter?45 cited
2023Environmental regulation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from green innovation44 cited
2024Assessing environmental protection Tax's impact on firms' green practices: The mediating effect of green innovation and the moderating effect of executive green awareness40 cited
2022The Impact Mechanism of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Sustainability Performance—Micro-Evidence from China34 cited