The Antecedent of Relative Advantage in Mobile Payment E-Wallet

Mira Rustine · Chyntia Ika Ratnapuri · Nur Azmi Karim · Doni Purnama Alamsyah

11 citations0/0 files storedInternational Seminar on Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science (ISMODE)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Technology Adoption and User Behaviour Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the support of the behavior of mobile payment e-wallet users on the relative advantage of users. There are supporting factors of the relative advantage of mobile payment users including responsiveness, smartness, mobility, ease of use, and usefulness. The research was conducted using a quantitative survey, while the research respondents were mobile payment e-wallet users in the city of Bandung with a total of 200 respondents. Data from respondents was taken through a questionnaire with predetermined answer choices, then data from the questionnaire were tabulated and processed through SmartPLS to determine the factors that could support the increase in the relative advantage of mobile payment e-wallets. The results of the study found that there was good support from the notion of mobility and usefulness in supporting the increase in the relative advantage of e-wallet users. Other factors of user behavior including responsiveness, smartness, ease of use actually have a positive relationship with an increase in relative advantage. However, it does not have a big impact so it is not recommended to be part of the supporting factors for relative advantage. The findings of this study explain the antecedent of relative advantage on mobile payment, where the supporting factors that have an impact on relative advantage are perceived mobility and usefulness. The research findings serve as information for mobile payment e-wallet providers in making decisions to evaluate the relative advantages of mobile payments from the user’s perspective.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

2009An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment 2009Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis 1999The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use 2011“Highly Recommended!” The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews 2020Factors influencing the adoption postponement of mobile payment services in the hospitality sector during a pandemic 2016Predicting the adoption of mobile financial services: The impacts of perceived mobility and personal habit 2017Understanding the mobile payment technology acceptance based on valence theory 2006Social Influence for Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-Use of Course Delivery Systems.

Cited by

2022Model of Relative Advantage on Mobile Payment 2022Mediation Model of E-Learning Adoption 2022The Mobility and Its Impact on Mobile Payment Adoption

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.