SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor’s new clothes
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor’s new clothes (2022)Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, pred…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Effects of training on qualit…Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Reproducibility of peer revie…Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000)Empirical assessment of effec…Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Quantity and Quality of Sleep and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes (2009)A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World (2011)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The American Psychological Association (1919)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders (1975)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing Model (1987)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scientific peer review (2011)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2000Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses1,398 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2004
Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
268 cited
  • 2000Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?254 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.