SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A robust Bayesian bias‐adjusted random effects model for consideration of uncertainty about bias terms in evidence synthesis
13 references·0 citing·45 second hop
A robust Bayesian bias‐adjusted random effects model for consideration of uncertainty about bias terms in evidence synthesis (2022)A robust Bayesian bias‐adjusted random ef…Robust Decision Analysis under Severe Uncertainty and Ambiguous Tradeoffs: An Invasive Species Case Study (2021)Robust Decision Analysis unde…A bias‐corrected meta‐analysis model for combining, studies of different types and quality (2020)A bias‐corrected meta‐analysi…Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approaches (2019)Comparison of bias adjustment…Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science (2019)Communicating uncertainty abo…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Adjusting Trial Results for Biases in Meta-Analysis: Combining Data-Based Evidence on Bias With Detailed Trial Assessment (2019)Adjusting Trial Results for B…Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Models for Potentially Biased Evidence in Meta-Analysis using Empirically Based Priors (2008)Models for Potentially Biased…Bias Modelling in Evidence Synthesis (2008)Bias Modelling in Evidence Sy…A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Eff…Bayesian approaches to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in complex cost‐effectiveness modelling (2003)Bayesian approaches to multip…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute (2013)Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions (2019)Recovery of Inter-Block Information when Block Sizes are Unequal (1971)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Issues relating to confounding and meta‐analysis when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions (2012)Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences (2020)Value of Information Analytical Methods: Report 2 of the ISPOR Value of Information Analysis Emerging Good Practices Task Force (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014)Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis (2015)An Introduction to Markov Modelling for Economic Evaluation (1998)Handling Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Models (2000)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Uncertainty and Patient Heterogeneity in Medical Decision Models (2010)Probabilistic sensitivity analysis in health economics (2011)The assessment and appraisal of regenerative medicines and cell therapy products: an exploration of methods for review, economic evaluation and appraisal (2017)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages (2014)Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (2015)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020)The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers (2020)The Evolving Field of Risk Communication (2020)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias Assessment in Outcomes Research: The Role of Relative Versus Absolute Approaches (2021)Dynamic meta-analysis: a method of using global evidence for local decision making (2021)Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
  • 2012Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 21,206 cited
  • 2013Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3468 cited
  • 2019Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science449 cited
  • 2008Bias Modelling in Evidence Synthesis322 cited
  • 2003Bayesian approaches to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in complex cost‐effectiveness modelling235 cited
  • 2008Models for Potentially Biased Evidence in Meta-Analysis using Empirically Based Priors150 cited
  • 2019Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approaches61 cited
  • 2020A bias‐corrected meta‐analysis model for combining, studies of different types and quality38 cited
  • 2019Adjusting Trial Results for Biases in Meta-Analysis: Combining Data-Based Evidence on Bias With Detailed Trial Assessment17 cited
  • 2021Robust Decision Analysis under Severe Uncertainty and Ambiguous Tradeoffs: An Invasive Species Case Study11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work