SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A methodology for projecting the return on investment of training technologies
8 references·0 citing·30 second hop
A methodology for projecting the return on investment of training technologies (2022)A methodology for projecting the return o…The Nature of Expertise (2014)The Nature of ExpertiseEvaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels (2009)Evaluating Training Programs …Federation of American Scientists (2006)Federation of American Scient…Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick (1994)Levels of evaluation: Beyond …The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. (1993)The role of deliberate practi…A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. (1986)A framework for clinical eval…Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs (1975)Techniques for Evaluating Tra…Evaluation of management training: A practical framework, with cases, for evaluating training needs and results, (1970)Evaluation of management trai…Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance (1981)A methodological framework for assessing health indices (1985)Study Design for Concurrent Development, Assessment, and Implementation of New Diagnostic Imaging Technology (2002)Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. (2003)Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests (2009)Handbook in research and evaluation (1971)Out of the Crisis (1982)The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees (2002)Post-Capitalist Society (2012)A Critique of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model (2017)The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020) (2021)Conditions of Learning (1965)The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring (1984)Flow: the psychology of optimal experience (1990)EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints (1996)Child Development and Emergent Literacy (1998)A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA (1997)Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. (2003)Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers (2007)The flawed four‐level evaluation model (1996)A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence (2004)The Science of Training and Development in Organizations (2012)Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems (1989)Long-term working memory. (1995)The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. (2000)In the Shadow of Death (2007)Using video games to enhance learning in digital systems (2008)Like It! Learn It! Use It? (2010)SOAP‐M: a training evaluation model for HR (2012)Managerial Training Effectiveness:An Assessment through Kirkpatrick Framework (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1993The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.9,542 cited
  • 2009Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels4,738 cited
  • 2014The Nature of Expertise2,173 cited
  • 1975Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs1,236 cited
  • 1994Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick216 cited
  • 1986A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.195 cited
  • 2006Federation of American Scientists48 cited
  • 1970Evaluation of management training: A practical framework, with cases, for evaluating training needs and results,39 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work