SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific Communication
0 references·16 citing·53 second hop
Scientific Communication (1980)Scientific CommunicationDecoding the writing styles of disciplines: A large-scale quantitative analysis (2024)Decoding the writing styles o…Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing (2022)Understanding the peer review…The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links (2022)The Social Systems Citation T…Research excellence in Africa: Policies, perceptions, and performance (2017)Research excellence in Africa…Evaluations by Peer Review in Science (2013)Evaluations by Peer Review in…Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science (2012)Scientific Communication and …The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review (2011)The Hawthorne effect in journ…Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems (2011)Peer Review and Bibliometric:…Does the Journal Peer Review Select the "Best" from the Work Submitted? The State of Empirical Research (2010)Does the Journal Peer Review …Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2009)Extent of type I and type II …A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)A content analysis of referee…Evaluation des Peer‐Review‐Verfahrens bei der Angewandten Chemie** (1993)Evaluation des Peer‐Review‐Ve…An Evaluation of the Peer Review Process at Angewandte Chemie (1993)An Evaluation of the Peer Rev…Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Reliability, fairness, object…Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Does the need for agreement a…Informal scientific communication in the agricultural sciences† (1983)Informal scientific communica…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Reassembling the Social (2005)Field-specific mediatization: Testing the combination of social theory and mediatization theory using the example of scientific communication (2017)The Nature of Scientific Practice and Science Education (2018)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)A Critique of the Bucket Classification of Journals: The ABDC List as an Example (2016)The effect of the “very important paper” (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis (2016)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Does cumulative advantage affect collective learning in science? An agent-based simulation (2011)Peer review versus citations – An analysis of best paper prizes (2012)Motivos de rejeição dos artigos nos periódicos de administração (2016)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Real science what it is, and what it means (2000)Real Science (2000)The author–editor game (2015)Наукометрія та управління науковою діяльністю: вкотре про світове та українське (2019)The use of OpenAlex to produce meaningful bibliometric global overlay maps of science on the individual, institutional, and national levels (2024)Public Knowledge: An essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science (1969)Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal? (2007)Citation gamesmanship: testing for evidence of ego bias in peer review (2012)What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review (2016)Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2017)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Science granting councils in Sub-Saharan Africa: Trends and tensions (2019)Medical research versus disease burden in Africa (2020)International research collaboration: is Africa different? A cross-country panel data analysis (2023)A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1964)Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2002)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Does writing style affect gender differences in the research performance of articles?: An empirical study of BERT-based textual sentiment analysis (2023)The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions (2023)Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Grounding in communication. (1991)Perspectives on socially shared cognition. (1991)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Diachronic changes in lexical density of research article abstracts: A corpus-based study (2024)How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications (2024)The accuracy-bias trade-offs in AI text detection tools and their impact on fairness in scholarly publication (2025)Individual versus general structured feedback to improve agreement in grant peer review: a randomized controlled trial (2021)Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability: A mixed-method study (2022)Variability and negligence: grant peer review panels evaluating impact ex ante (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Research excellence in Africa: Policies, perceptions, and performance77 cited
  • 2012Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science74 cited
  • 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
  • 2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?47 cited
  • 1991Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?39 cited
  • 2022Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing32 cited
  • 2009Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition32 cited
  • 2010Does the Journal Peer Review Select the "Best" from the Work Submitted? The State of Empirical Research31 cited
  • 2011The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review31 cited
  • 2024Decoding the writing styles of disciplines: A large-scale quantitative analysis25 cited
  • 1993An Evaluation of the Peer Review Process at Angewandte Chemie21 cited
  • 2022The Social Systems Citation Theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links19 cited
  • 2011Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 1993Evaluation des Peer‐Review‐Verfahrens bei der Angewandten Chemie**15 cited
  • 2013Evaluations by Peer Review in Science14 cited
  • 1983Informal scientific communication in the agricultural sciences†13 cited