References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
• 2015Emerging trends in peer review—a survey192 cited
• 2019How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia101 cited
• 2014From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review78 cited
• 1995The postgutenberg galaxy: How to get there from here70 cited
• 1982A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study57 cited
• 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
• 1982Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science51 cited
• 1982Publication, politics, and scientific progress51 cited
• 1983Commentary on the makridakis time series competition (M‐competition)50 cited
• 1982Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?50 cited
• 1982Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics50 cited
• 1982What is the source of bias in peer review?47 cited
• 1982On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”47 cited