SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration · Study

ReviewBest Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration

Unknown author2011

OA

Reviewgold2011

Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration

Unknown author

160 citations·0/0 files stored·PLoS Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Clinical practice guidelines implementation Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 160 citations exist upstream.

References

2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration 2010An international registry of systematic-review protocols 2004Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 2002Publishing Protocols of Systematic Reviews 2010Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process

Cited by

2020Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine 2023The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes 2020Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review 2019Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data 2024Advancing the methodology of mapping reviews: A scoping review 2021The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework 2023A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews 2012

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015article · 3 shared references 2011Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultationreview · 3 shared references 2016Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?article · 3 shared references 2013Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviewsreview · 3 shared references 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic changearticle · 3 shared references 2023Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológicaarticle · 3 shared references

Details

Year2011

Typereview

Published2011-02-22

VenuePLoS Medicine

ISSN-L1549-1277

Languageen

Citations160

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009

openalex_workW4237357387

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Debunking myths of protocol registration