Knowledge Synthesis

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, the volume of publications on topics in health professions education (HPE) has increased dramatically. To help the HPE community integrate some of these multiple studies, researchers are increasingly creating, consuming, and citing knowledge syntheses. This chapter defines and describes the characteristics of a knowledge synthesis. It situates knowledge syntheses in the context of HPE, including a discussion of how they may be used and the five types of knowledge syntheses that are prevalent in, or appropriate for use by, those in HPE. These are narrative reviews, systematic reviews, umbrella reviews (aka meta-syntheses), scoping reviews, and realist reviews. The chapter outlines a seven-step process for those seeking to undertake knowledge syntheses. They are defining a focused research question, determining knowledge synthesis type, recruiting the research team, identifying materials for inclusion, extracting key data, analyzing and synthesizing results, and reporting. Lastly, the chapter explores the available training for knowledge syntheses in HPE.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.