SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Knowledge Synthesis
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Knowledge Synthesis (2018)Knowledge SynthesisResearch Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (2017)Research Synthesis and Meta-A…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Summarizing systematic reviewsSynthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Synthesizing information syst…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS (2014)On being ‘Systematic’ in Lite…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Integration of evidence from …AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…The Transition (1993)The TransitionUser Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Rise of Motivational Information Systems: A Review of Gamification Research (2017)Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition‐specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues (2021)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: A systematic umbrella review of the global evidence (2020)Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions (2006)Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) (2007)Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
  • 2015Summarizing systematic reviews2,581 cited
  • 1993The Transition2,498 cited
  • 2014Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews1,903 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2017Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach1,715 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009
Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses
713 cited
  • 2014On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS489 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.