SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bogus Evidence
7 references·1 citing·35 second hop
Bogus Evidence (2013)Bogus EvidenceScientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)Scientific Misconduct and the…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers (2008)Falsified papers in high-impa…What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)What Do Mentoring and Trainin…Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)Lessons from the Darsee AffairScientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective (2015)Scientific misconducts and au…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Multiple Publications: The Main Reason for the Retraction of Papers in Computer Science (2018)Posthumous co-authorship revisited (2021)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Characteristics of Successful and Failed Mentoring Relationships (2012)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Scientific Utopia (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Psychology of intergroup relations (1986)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict (2000)Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)THE MEANING OF FAILED REPLICATIONS: A REVIEW AND PROPOSAL (2015)When Authorship Fails (1997)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,380 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data2,022 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,282 cited
  • 2012Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science323 cited
  • 2007What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists269 cited
  • 1983Lessons from the Darsee Affair149 cited
  • 2008Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers100 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work