SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
0 references·11 citing·41 second hop
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare? (1996)Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller …Completeness of main outcomes across randomized trials in entire discipline: survey of chronic lung disease outcomes in preterm infants (2015)Completeness of main outcomes…Role of meta-analyses and of large randomized trials in the study of cancer treatments (2008)Role of meta-analyses and of …Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power (2008)Publication bias was not a go…Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses (2005)Synthesizing medical evidence…Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Randomized Trials for Mental Health-Related Interventions (2005)Comparison of Large Versus Sm…Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials (2004)Larger effect sizes were asso…Identification and assessment of ongoing trials in health technology assessment reviews (2004)Identification and assessment…Evaluation of interventions (2002)Evaluation of interventionsMeta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based Practice (2001)Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evi…Weighting bias in meta-analysis of binary outcomes (2000)Weighting bias in meta-analys…Meta-Analyses and Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1998)Meta-Analyses and Large Rando…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Practical statistics for medical research (1992)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data (2004)Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data (2007)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)The Delphi List (1998)Combining Evidence in Nursing Research (2005)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity (2010)Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well‐Being Contributes to Health and Longevity (2011)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review (2017)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Desired Attributes of Evidence Assessments for Evidence-based Practices (2006)The Registrar (2010)Editorial: Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Misleading meta-analysis (1995)Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Differences in methodological quality between positive and negative published clinical trials (2014)The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication (2019)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials (1998)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis (2000)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1998Meta-Analyses and Large Randomized, Controlled Trials56 cited
  • 2005Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses41 cited
  • 2005Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Randomized Trials for Mental Health-Related Interventions38 cited
  • 2015Completeness of main outcomes across randomized trials in entire discipline: survey of chronic lung disease outcomes in preterm infants33 cited
  • 2000Weighting bias in meta-analysis of binary outcomes31 cited
  • 2002Evaluation of interventions25 cited
  • 2008Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power17 cited
  • 2008Role of meta-analyses and of large randomized trials in the study of cancer treatments9 cited
  • 2004Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials9 cited
  • 2001Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based Practice9 cited
  • 2004Identification and assessment of ongoing trials in health technology assessment reviews6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work