Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Learning Disabilities

0 references·16 citing·52 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

2009Early Childhood Intervention and Life-Cycle Skill Development: Evidence from Head Start693 cited
1995Toward a definition of dyslexia476 cited
2001Incidence of Reading Disability in a Population-Based Birth Cohort, 1976–1982, Rochester, Minn302 cited
2006Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Distinguishing Between Children With and Without Reading Disabilities292 cited
2004Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers262 cited
2000Trends in Demography of Childhood Poverty and Disability261 cited
1997Critical Conceptual and Methodological Considerations in Reading Intervention Research240 cited
2006An Evaluation of Intensive Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties228 cited
2011Learning Disabilities, Dyslexia, and Vision216 cited
2010Teacher Attitudes Toward Dyslexia: Effects on Teacher Expectations and the Academic Achievement of Students With Dyslexia189 cited
2015The Effects of Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency for Students With Reading Disabilities178 cited
2005Evidence-Based Assessment of Learning Disabilities in Children and Adolescents157 cited
2016Executive functioning predicts academic achievement in middle school: A four-year longitudinal study150 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003Comparing the Self-Concept of Students With and Without Learning Disabilities142 cited

2009The Forgotten Learning Disability: Epidemiology of Written-Language Disorder in a Population-Based Birth Cohort (1976–1982), Rochester, Minnesota139 cited

2005Validity of Alternative Approaches for the Identification of Learning Disabilities136 cited