SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is three better than one? simulating the effect of reviewer selection and behavior on the quality and efficiency of peer review
15 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Is three better than one? simulating the effect of reviewer selection and behavior on the quality and efficiency of peer review (2015)Is three better than one? simulating the …Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism (2014)Mechanism change in a simulat…Secretive and Subjective, Peer Review Proves Resistant to Study (2013)Secretive and Subjective, Pee…Opening the Black-Box of Peer Review: An Agent-Based Model of Scientist Behaviour (2013)Opening the Black-Box of Peer…Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure (2012)Saint Matthew strikes again: …Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study (2012)Does incentive provision incr…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewSocial Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review' (2011)Social Simulation That 'Peers…Scientific peer review (2011)Scientific peer reviewPeer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average (2011)Peer-review in a world with r…Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding (2011)Peer Review, Program Officers…Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy (2011)Cooperation between Referees …Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)Alternatives to Peer Review: …Addressing Scientific Fraud (2011)Addressing Scientific FraudReviewing Peer Review (2008)Reviewing Peer ReviewPeer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Can peer review accolade awar…The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1960)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Ranking Games (2014)Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? (2017)Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication (2017)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game (2016)Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals (2017)The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures (2018)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring (2015)Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015) (2018)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation (1999)z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments (2007)What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics (2014)The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review (2017)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)Nine Criteria for a Measure of Scientific Output (2011)The risks associated with Artificial General Intelligence: A systematic review (2021)How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013)What Can We Learn from Many Labs Replications? (2019)Replication crisis or an opportunity to improve scientific production? (2020)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)On Performance of Peer Review for Academic Journals: Analysis Based on Distributed Parallel System (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2011Scientific peer review563 cited
  • 2008Reviewing Peer Review119 cited
  • 2012Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study102 cited
  • 2011Addressing Scientific Fraud84 cited
  • 2011Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average83 cited
  • 2011Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation68 cited
  • 2012Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure62 cited
  • 2013Opening the Black-Box of Peer Review: An Agent-Based Model of Scientist Behaviour44 cited
  • 2011Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy35 cited
  • 2011Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding35 cited
  • 2011Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review'31 cited
  • 2014Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism28 cited
  • 2013Secretive and Subjective, Peer Review Proves Resistant to Study25 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

  • 2024Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment15 cited