Critical pragmatism and congestion charging in LondonDavid Banister2003-06-01articleInternational Social Science Journal59 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Transportation Planning and Optimizationtransportation and logistics systemsUrban Planning and GovernanceAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.References2001Making Social Science Matter1999Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems1993Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice2001Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World2000Going round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes1999Reflections on the future understanding of planning practiceCited by2008Building legitimacy for risky policies: The cost of avoiding conflict in Stockholm2007SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES2006Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a comparative evaluation of transport planning projects2007A Classification of Travel Demand Management Measures2022Decreasing the share of travel by car. Strategies for implementing ‘push’ or ‘pull’ measures in a traditionally car-centric transport and land use planning2015Building acceptance for congestion charges – the Swedish experiences compared2015Citizen participation or representative government – Building legitimacy for the Gothenburg congestion tax2013Choosing conflict on the road to sustainable mobility: A risky strategy for breaking path dependency in urban policy making