Citation map · Study

A survey exploring biomedical editors’ perceptions of editorial interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines

15 references·1 citing·42 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited
2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited
2019Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research153 cited
2014Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting92 cited
2018Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by