SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Giving Reasons
0 references·10 citing·38 second hop
Giving Reasons (1995)Giving ReasonsÁtláthatósági és indokolási követelmények az európai platformjogban (2023)Átláthatósági és indokolási k…What the Judge Argues is Not What the Judge Thinks – Eye Tracking as a Window into Judicial Decision Making (2020)What the Judge Argues is Not …Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making (2019)Re-engineering justice? Robot…Legal Techniques for Rationalizing Biased Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Judges (2019)Legal Techniques for Rational…“Is This What You’re Talking About?”: Identity Negotiation in International Teaching Assistants’ Instructional Interactions with U.S. College Students (2016)“Is This What You’re Talking …Legal Fictions and the Limits of Legal Language (2015)Legal Fictions and the Limits…Legal fictions and the limits of legal language (2013)Legal fictions and the limits…Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making (2011)Lay Judgments of Judicial Dec…The Public Face of Presumptions (2008)The Public Face of Presumptio…The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions (2004)The Impact of Representation …Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (1991)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning (2013)Being a Correct Presumption vs. Being Presumably the Case (2016)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness (1985)Explorations in the functions of language (1973)Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (1992)Genre analysis : English in academic and research settings. By John M. Swales (Cambridge applied linguistics series.) Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Pp. 260. Cloth $34.50, paper $15.95. (1993)Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. (1968)Discourse Strategies (1982)Relevance: Communication and Cognition (1986)An Intersectional Analysis of the English-Competency Experiences of International Teaching Assistants (2021)The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology? (2014)Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority (2015)Curbing the Court : Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence (2020)Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964)The History of Sexuality (1976)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Right to a Fair Trial: Towards a Robot Judge? (2020)Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated? (2023)EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF JURISPRUDENCE IN THE ERA OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS (2023)Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006)Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection (2013)Ethnic Bias in Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Criminal Appeals in Kenya (2022)Anti-corruption campaign, political connections, and court bias: Evidence from Chinese corporate lawsuits (2023)The Rise of the Chinese Judiciary and Its Limits: Administrative Litigation in the Reform Period (2025)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. (1998)Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and the Activity of the Experimental Article in Science (1989)Towards an adventurous institutional politics: The prefigurative ‘as if’ and the reposing of what’s real (2020)The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability (2007)Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation (2016)Why a Right to Legibility of Automated Decision-Making Exists in the General Data Protection Regulation (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making89 cited
  • 2019Legal Techniques for Rationalizing Biased Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Judges57 cited
  • 2011Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making55 cited
  • 2004The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions19 cited
  • 2016“Is This What You’re Talking About?”: Identity Negotiation in International Teaching Assistants’ Instructional Interactions with U.S. College Students19 cited
  • 2013Legal fictions and the limits of legal language18 cited
  • 2015Legal Fictions and the Limits of Legal Language12 cited
  • 2008The Public Face of Presumptions11 cited
  • 2023Átláthatósági és indokolási követelmények az európai platformjogban9 cited
  • 2020What the Judge Argues is Not What the Judge Thinks – Eye Tracking as a Window into Judicial Decision Making1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work