Bibliometric analysis of the 100 most‐disruptive articles in ophthalmology

Parth A. Patel · Prem N. Patel · Adán Z. Becerra · Mitul C. Mehta

13 citations0/0 files storedClinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

TABLE S1: 100 most-disruptive ophthalmology papers published 2000–2014. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories 2019Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology 2009Publication and citation analysis of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology over a 10‐year period: the evolution of an ophthalmology journal

Cited by

2024Identifying disruptive papers in pharmacy literature that changed clinical practice: 1954-2014 2023Citation versus disruption in the military: Analysis of the top disruptive military trauma research publications

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.