SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Reviews of Epidemiological Studies of Etiology and Prevalence
16 references·1 citing·44 second hop
Systematic Reviews of Epidemiological Studies of Etiology and Prevalence (2022)Systematic Reviews of Epidemiological Stu…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration (2021)Strengthening the reporting o…Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes (2018)Identifying the PECO: A frame…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (2015)Methodological guidance for s…Meta-analysis of prevalence (2013)Meta-analysis of prevalenceThe nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)The nuts and bolts of PROSPER…GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating u…Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data (2010)Random effects meta-analysis …Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Critical evaluation of the Ne…Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Tools for assessing quality a…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Sensitive questions in surveys. (2007)Sensitive questions in survey…Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)Lifetime Prevalence and Age-o…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies (1998)Meta-analysis Spurious precis…Philosophy of Natural Science (1966)Philosophy of Natural ScienceApplying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing (2024)Applying Bradford Hill to ass…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. (1998)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity (2008)Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review (2011)Privacy and human behavior in the age of information (2015)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review (2013)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Child abuse: Adolescent records vs. adult recall (1990)Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of DSM-III-R Psychiatric Disorders in the United States (1994)The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) (2004)Prevalence, Severity, and Comorbidity of 12-Month DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2005)The Prevalence and Correlates of Eating Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (2006)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Associations between insomnia and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: Evidence from mendelian randomization and multivariable regression analyses (2022)Associations between sleep duration and cardiovascular diseases: A meta-review and meta-analysis of observational and Mendelian randomization studies (2022)Standardizing the reporting of Mendelian randomization studies (2023)Design and natural science research on information technology (1995)Developing relationships in business networks (1995)Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact1 (2013)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Global prevalence of depression and elevated depressive symptoms among adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication20,388 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2010Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses17,378 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
  • 2015Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data3,116 cited
  • 2007Sensitive questions in surveys.3,051 cited
  • 1966Philosophy of Natural Science2,530 cited
  • 2013Meta-analysis of prevalence2,159 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2021Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration1,643 cited
  • 2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
  • 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
  • 2018Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,337 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
  • 1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies997 cited
  • 2010Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data755 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing7 cited