Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Does the culture of science publishing need to change from the status quo principle of “trust me”?

8 references·3 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,578 cited
2021Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology436 cited
2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
2019Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment77 cited
2021From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond59 cited
2019Ending the retraction stigma: Encouraging the reporting of errors in the biomedical record52 cited
2016Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry26 cited
2016Legends in Science: from Boom to Bust11 cited

Cited by

2024The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review16 cited
2024Beyond disclaimers: the need for a curation-based model of PubMed7 cited
2025Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work