Citation map · Study

Critically Appraising the Quality of Reporting of American College of Surgeons TQIP Studies in the Era of Large Data Research

14 references·0 citing·53 second hopsampled

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2014The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies9,866 cited
2015The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement5,686 cited
2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited
2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
2015Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline104 cited
2020Pediatric Firearm Injuries and Fatalities: Do Racial Disparities Exist?55 cited
2018A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions47 cited
2012Methodological and Ethical Quality of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Gastrointestinal Surgery33 cited
2019Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal28 cited
2020Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value21 cited
2017Journal impact factor and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: an empirical study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.