SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
DORA-compliant measures to assess research quality and impact in biomedical institutions: review of published research, international best practice and Delphi survey
16 references·1 citing·40 second hop
DORA-compliant measures to assess research quality and impact in biomedical institutions: review of published research, international best practice and Delphi survey (2022)DORA-compliant measures to assess researc…Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Academic criteria for promoti…The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. (2018)The science of team science: …Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review (2017)Guidance on Conducting and RE…Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)Searching and synthesising ‘g…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps (2016)Advancing scoping study metho…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: The decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars (2014)Interdisciplinary promises ve…The Impact Factor Game (2006)The Impact Factor GameState‐of‐the‐Evidence Reviews: Advantages and Challenges of Including Grey Literature (2006)State‐of‐the‐Evidence Reviews…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research (1995)Qualitative Research: Consens…Ten simple rules for empowering women in STEM (2022)Ten simple rules for empoweri…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups (1995)The Delphi technique: myths and realities (2003)Survey Research Methods (2010)How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities (2018)Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness (2018)Extreme events and gender-based violence: a mixed-methods systematic review (2022)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map (2020)Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness (2021)ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi (2024)Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000)The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review (2001)Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships (2002)Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving (2018)The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. (2018)A Framework for Convergence Research in the Hazards and Disaster Field: The Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure CONVERGE Facility (2020)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 1995Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research3,469 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2017Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review2,200 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2018The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.502 cited
  • 2016Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies486 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
  • 2006State‐of‐the‐Evidence Reviews: Advantages and Challenges of Including Grey Literature408 cited
  • 2006The Impact Factor Game372 cited
  • 2016Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

282 cited
  • 2020Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities241 cited
  • 2014Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: The decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars99 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Ten simple rules for empowering women in STEM14 cited