SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study
16 references·1 citing·51 second hop
A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study (2022)A search of only four key databases would…Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study (2018)Rapid reviews may produce dif…Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study (2018)Abbreviated literature search…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study (2016)The contribution of databases…Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed (2016)Publication Trends in Acupunc…Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study (2016)Comparing the coverage, recal…Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions (2015)Using data sources beyond Pub…Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2014)Meta-epidemiologic analysis i…Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine Must Search Chinese Databases to Reduce Language Bias (2013)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments (2012)What is a rapid review? A met…Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Expediting systematic reviews…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Acupuncture: Methodological Diversity in Database Searching (2005)Cochrane Systematic Reviews i…LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RAND…Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system (2003)Literature searching for clin…Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence (2024)Rapid review: A review of met…Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews (2012)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition‐specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map (2018)Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review (2019)The Impact of COVID-19 School Closure on Child and Adolescent Health: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)Simple Pooling versus Combining in Meta-Analysis (2001)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2014)Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods (2015)Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ (1996)Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. (1998)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Model Transparency and Validation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 (2012)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide (2018)Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study (2022)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) research: A bibliometric analysis of publication trends over the first 20 years (2020)Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis (2021)Ayurveda research: Emerging trends and mapping to sustainable development goals (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2010Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews752 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2003LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES693 cited
  • 2016Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study202 cited
  • 2003Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system194 cited
  • 2016Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed177 cited
  • 2015Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions166 cited
  • 2012What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments137 cited
  • 2016The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study118 cited
  • 2018Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study95 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study
72 cited
  • 2014Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews69 cited
  • 2013Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine Must Search Chinese Databases to Reduce Language Bias50 cited
  • 2005Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Acupuncture: Methodological Diversity in Database Searching29 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence8 cited