Work flexibly, travel less? The impact of telework and flextime on mobility behavior in Switzerland

Fabienne Wöhner

113 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Transport Geography

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Transportation Planning and Optimization Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Abstract

There is an ongoing discussion about the impact of flexible forms of work on travel behavior. Though it is generally accepted that telework decreases distance commuted, there are mixed conclusions about the notion that non-work-related journeys could be offsetting any saved commute. This paper investigates the influence of two flexible working arrangements – namely telework and flextime – on commutes, non-work traffic, and peak-period travel in Switzerland. Using the 2015 Swiss Mobility and Transport Microcensus (MTMC), this study analyzes flexible working arrangements with respect to their effects on traffic. The results show that people who work partly from home – compared to those who never telework – do indeed commute less; however, their non-work travel increases. This rebound effect completely offsets the saved commutes, resulting in a zero impact on the total distances covered. Only people who work exclusively remotely show less total mobility compared to those who never telework. However, only a small minority of people work only from home, with most teleworkers combining working on-site with some degree of working from home. Moreover, this study finds only slight potential for relieving traffic congestion through flexible working arrangements: Whereas teleworkers are less likely to commute during evening peak periods, people working flextime are even more likely to commute during morning rush hours. Hence, the distinction between morning and evening peak periods should be taken into account in future studies. Furthermore, research on flexible working arrangements and travel behavior benefits from the consideration of both non-work travel and total travel as well as the separation of part-time from full-time telework.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

References

2015How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings 1986Telecommunications and travel relationships: a review 2004Telecommuting, Residential Location, and Commute-Distance Traveled: Evidence from State of California Employees 1991Telecommuting and travel: state of the practice, state of the art 2020Telework and daily travel: New evidence from Sweden 2009Review: State of teleactivities 1985Telecommunications and Travel: Substitution or Modified Mobility?2011Are telecommuting and personal travel complements or substitutes?

Cited by

2024The interplay between teleworking choice and commute distance 2023COVID-19 and Teleworking: Lessons, Current Issues and Future Directions for Transport and Land-Use Planning 2023The relations between working from home and travel behaviour: a panel analysis 2025How does telework impact daily and residential mobilities: New geographies of working and living in Switzerland 2023Inferring nonwork travel semantics and revealing the nonlinear relationships with the community built environment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.