SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CORE-IBD: A Multidisciplinary International Consensus Initiative to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Randomized Controlled Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
6 references·0 citing·24 second hop
CORE-IBD: A Multidisciplinary International Consensus Initiative to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Randomized Controlled Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2022)CORE-IBD: A Multidisciplinary Internation…A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health (2020)A systematic review finds Cor…The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1…Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)Core Outcome Set-STAndards fo…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Using the Delphi Technique to…OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)OMERACT: An international ini…An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review (2011)The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines (2016)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. (1998)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement (2019)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols (2022)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Core outcome sets in medical research (2022)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017The COMET Handbook: version 1.02,021 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2011Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies899 cited
  • 2017Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations802 cited
  • 2007OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology536 cited
  • 2020A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health125 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work