SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials
16 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials (2022)Bayesian network meta-analysis methods fo…On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis (2021)On weakly informative prior d…Multilevel Network Meta-Regression for Population-Adjusted Treatment Comparisons (2020)Multilevel Network Meta-Regre…Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal (2017)Methods for Population-Adjust…A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons (2015)A Bayesian missing data frame…Mixed treatment comparisons using aggregate and individual participant level data (2012)Mixed treatment comparisons u…NICE DSU Technical Support Document 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomised Controlled Trials. (2011)NICE DSU Technical Support Do…NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)NICE DSU Technical Support Do…Meta‐analysis of a binary outcome using individual participant data and aggregate data (2010)Meta‐analysis of a binary out…Meta‐analysis of individual‐ and aggregate‐level data (2007)Meta‐analysis of individual‐ …Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data (2007)Meta‐analysis of continuous o…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head (2002)Individual patient‐ versus gr…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis (2002)A comparison of summary patie…Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Is Network Meta-analysis a Revolutionary Statistical Tool for Improving the Reliability of Clinical Trial Results? A Brief Overview and Emerging Issues Arising (2023)Is Network Meta-analysis a Re…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses (2013)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Pharmacological treatments for generalised anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2019)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)NICE DSU TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT 3: HETEROGENEITY: SUBGROUPS, META-REGRESSION, BIAS AND BIAS-ADJUSTMENT (2011)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Multivariate Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Ignoring Within-Study Correlation (2009)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation (2016)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Bayesian Methods for Evidence Synthesis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (2006)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis (2015)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Multiple Treatment Comparisons: An Introduction to Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2008)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Population Adjustment Methods for Indirect Comparisons: A Review of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals (2019)Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study (2020)Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2011NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials555 cited
  • 2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head469 cited
  • 2017Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal398 cited
  • 2002A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis394 cited
  • 2007Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data280 cited
  • 2011NICE DSU Technical Support Document 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomised Controlled Trials.187 cited
  • 2020Multilevel Network Meta-Regression for Population-Adjusted Treatment Comparisons181 cited
  • 2021On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis181 cited
  • 2007Meta‐analysis of individual‐ and aggregate‐level data162 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015
A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons
132 cited
  • 2012Mixed treatment comparisons using aggregate and individual participant level data116 cited
  • 2010Meta‐analysis of a binary outcome using individual participant data and aggregate data108 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Is Network Meta-analysis a Revolutionary Statistical Tool for Improving the Reliability of Clinical Trial Results? A Brief Overview and Emerging Issues Arising12 cited