SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis
6 references·2 citing·25 second hop
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis (2022)Double arcsine transform not appropriate …The Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation for the meta‐analysis of proportions: Recent criticisms were seriously misleading (2021)The Freeman–Tukey double arcs…Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes (2021)Empirical Comparisons of 12 M…Meta-analysis of Proportions Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models (2020)Meta-analysis of Proportions …Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives (2020)Arcsine‐based transformations…Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions (2019)Seriously misleading results …Meta-analysis of prevalence (2013)Meta-analysis of prevalenceMethods for meta-analysis and meta-regression of binomial data: concepts and tutorial with Stata command metapreg (2024)Methods for meta-analysis and…Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys (2024)Honorary authorship is highly…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (2015)Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis (2015)How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study (2020)Suicide, self-harm and suicidal ideation during COVID-19: A systematic review (2021)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Sensitivity analysis with iterative outlier detection for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Global prevalence and associated risk factors of posttraumatic stress disorder during COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis (2021)Conducting Meta-analyses of Proportions in R (2023)Global Prevalence of Childhood Exposure to Physical Violence within Domestic and Family Relationships in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis (2023)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses (2018)Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model (2015)Using Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation in Meta-analysis of Single Proportions (2022)Overcoming challenges in prevalence meta-analysis: the case for the Freeman-Tukey transform (2025)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Meta-analysis of prevalence2,159 cited
  • 2019Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions622 cited
  • 2020Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives343 cited
  • 2020Meta-analysis of Proportions Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models342 cited
  • 2021The Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation for the meta‐analysis of proportions: Recent criticisms were seriously misleading81 cited
  • 2021Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes51 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys30 cited
  • 2024Methods for meta-analysis and meta-regression of binomial data: concepts and tutorial with Stata command metapreg24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work