SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Investigation of text‐mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy—a case study
16 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Investigation of text‐mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy—a case study (2022)Investigation of text‐mining methodologie…Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media (2019)Systematic Literature Review …Catalogue of bias: observer bias (2018)Catalogue of bias: observer b…The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources (2017)The anchoring bias reflects r…bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)bibliometrix : An R-tool for …Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review (2016)Twitter as a Tool for Health …PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Constructing bibliometric net…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks (2014)CitNetExplorer: A new softwar…Bias in research (2014)Bias in researchSearch strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2013)Search strategies to identify…Applications of text mining within systematic reviews (2011)Applications of text mining w…Text Mining Infrastructure in R (2008)Text Mining Infrastructure in…The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study (2003)The role of the information s…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…Rapid review methods series: Guidance on the use of supportive software (2024)Rapid review methods series: …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)Untangling text data mining (1999)Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics (2004)Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention (2012)quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data (2018)stm : An R Package for Structural Topic Models (2019)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead (2020)Crisis leadership: A review and future research agenda (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy (2010)Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing in Mental Health: Systematic Review (2020)Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study (2020)What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review (2021)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (2020)The Psychology of Fake News (2021)The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction (2022)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis16,195 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2019Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media1,803 cited
  • 2016Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting1,409 cited
  • 2008Text Mining Infrastructure in R1,258 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 2014CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks699 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2016Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review634 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2014Bias in research294 cited
  • 2017The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources228 cited
  • 2011Applications of text mining within systematic reviews212 cited
  • 2013Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE145 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Catalogue of bias: observer bias118 cited
  • 2003The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study84 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Rapid review methods series: Guidance on the use of supportive software14 cited