Social prescribing: Exploring general practitioners' and healthcare professionals' perceptions of, and engagement with, the NHS model

Coco Moore · Peter F. Unwin · Frances Howie

29 citations0/0 files storedHealth & Social Care in the Community

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Art Therapy and Mental Health Health Services Management and Policy Healthcare Systems and Technology

Abstract

Social prescribing (SP) has rapidly expanded over recent years. Previously a bottom-up, community-led phenomenon, SP is now a formal part of structured NHS policy and practice. This study was designed to ascertain how general practitioners and other primary healthcare professionals (HCPs) within one clinical commissioning group (CCG) perceive and engage with this new NHS model. The research comprised an online survey distributed to HCPs within a predominately rural, English CCG between June and August 2021. Qualitative data were gathered and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Positive portrayals of SP were found, although definitions and perceptions varied greatly. Many HCPs reported high levels of engagement with SP services; yet referral rates appeared to remain significantly lower than the previously estimated 20% of primary care attendees referred for social reasons. Moreover, 96% of HCPs reported signposting patients directly to community or external services, rather than referring them to SP. This signposting, which has been positioned as a model of SP, reflects engagement with SP in practice, which is likely to have pre-dated the introduction of the fuller NHS model. HCPs may be unaware that this could be classed as a social prescription, and this type of SP remains uncaptured within NHS statistics. These results indicate an underuse of the national system set up to deliver one particular model of SP, rather than that SP does not occur. Additionally, despite national guidance issued to accompany the NHS model, practices such as referral and feedback processes, and link worker presence within practices, were not uniform even within this single CCG. Nevertheless, understanding is increasing as SP becomes embedded within primary care. The lack of consistency in referrals between practices warrants further examination in terms of equity of service choices to patients, as does the very low self-reported referral rate to SP.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Research Methods in Education 2019Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis 2017Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence 2017Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes 2019What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review 2018Social prescribing: where is the evidence?2017Link Worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions 2015What is social prescribing?

Cited by

2024Survey of general practitioners’ awareness, practice and perception of social prescribing across Europe 2023“Winging It”: An Exploration of the Self-Perceived Professional Identity of Social Prescribing Link Workers 2025Hospital in-reach family-centred social prescribing pilot for children with neurodisability: mixed methods evaluation with social return on investment analysis 2024A mixed methods investigation into GP attitudes and experiences of using social prescribing in their practice

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.