References

• 2018Investigating Ad Transparency Mechanisms in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook's Explanations1,501 cited
• 2019Internet Research : Ethical Guidelines 3.0440 cited
• 2017Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle398 cited
• 2018Frenemies376 cited
• 2014Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle331 cited
• 2019Discrimination through Optimization268 cited
• 2020Political Advertising Online and Offline232 cited
• 2016Hacking the electorate: how campaigns perceive voters207 cited
• 2016Prototype Politics: Technology-Intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy169 cited
• 2019The “Arbiters of What Our Voters See”: Facebook and Google’s Struggle with Policy, Process, and Enforcement around Political Advertising160 cited
• 2020Social media and democracy : the state of the field, prospects for reform125 cited
• 2019Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America124 cited
• 2016Political Microtargeting: Relationship Between Personalized Advertising on Facebook and Voters' Responses112 cited
• 2019Discrimination through Optimization: How Facebook's Ad Delivery Can Lead to Biased Outcomes111 cited