SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fairness-Aware Range Queries for Selecting Unbiased Data
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Fairness-Aware Range Queries for Selecting Unbiased Data (2022)Fairness-Aware Range Queries for Selectin…Managing bias and unfairness in data for decision support: a survey of machine learning and data engineering approaches to identify and mitigate bias and unfairness within data management and analytics systems (2021)Managing bias and unfairness …Designing Fair Ranking Schemes (2019)Designing Fair Ranking SchemesThe accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism (2018)The accuracy, fairness, and l…A Nutritional Label for Rankings (2018)A Nutritional Label for Ranki…Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (2017)Weapons of Math Destruction: …Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making (2017)Measuring discrimination in a…Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact (2017)Fairness Beyond Disparate Tre…Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments (2017)Fair Prediction with Disparat…On the (im)possibility of fairness (2016)On the (im)possibility of fai…Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores (2016)Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fa…Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Bandits (2016)Fairness in Learning: Classic…Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning (2016)Equality of Opportunity in Su…Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing (2015)Risk Assessment in Criminal S…Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact (2015)Certifying and Removing Dispa…Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)Big Data's Disparate ImpactData preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination (2011)Data preprocessing techniques…Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (2007)Fairness through awareness (2012)European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision Making and a “Right to Explanation” (2017)Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2017)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think (2013)Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (2014)Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject (2018)Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2019)Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—An introductory survey (2020)A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTORS OF ADULT OFFENDER RECIDIVISM: WHAT WORKS!* (1996)Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. (1998)The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. (2009)From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices (2019)Machine behaviour (2019)In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence (2020)Counterfactual Fairness (2017)Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art (2018)AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias (2019)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems (2019)Designing fair AI for managing employees in organizations: a review, critique, and design agenda (2020)Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities (2020)The (Im)possibility of fairness (2021)Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019)Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023)How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms (2016)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Fairness of Exposure in Rankings (2018)Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions (2020)Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy3,071 cited
  • 2014Big Data's Disparate Impact3,046 cited
  • 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning2,535 cited
  • 2017Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments2,157 cited
  • 2015Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact1,827 cited
  • 2011Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination1,304 cited
  • 2018The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism1,071 cited
  • 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores942 cited
  • 2017Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact630 cited
  • 2017Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making273 cited
  • 2015Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing256 cited
  • 2016On the (im)possibility of fairness247 cited
  • 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Bandits199 cited
  • 2019Designing Fair Ranking Schemes159 cited
  • 2018A Nutritional Label for Rankings102 cited
  • 2021Managing bias and unfairness in data for decision support: a survey of machine learning and data engineering approaches to identify and mitigate bias and unfairness within data management and analytics systems

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

97 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.