SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Calculating the power to examine treatment‐covariate interactions when planning an individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomized trials with a binary outcome
11 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Calculating the power to examine treatment‐covariate interactions when planning an individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomized trials with a binary outcome (2022)Calculating the power to examine treatmen…Individual Participant Data Meta‐Analysis (2021)Individual Participant Data M…Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning (2020)Individual participant data m…Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis (2018)Simulation-based power calcul…A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses (2018)A comparison of heterogeneity…One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information (2016)One-stage individual particip…Two-stage Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis and Generalized Forest Plots (2015)Two-stage Individual Particip…Using aggregate data to estimate the standard error of a treatment–covariate interaction in an individual patient data meta‐analysis (2012)Using aggregate data to estim…A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners (2011)A critical review of methods …Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data (2006)Covariate heterogeneity in me…A simple confidence interval for meta‐analysis (2002)A simple confidence interval …A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome (2001)A refined method for the meta…Nonlinear effects and effect modification at the participant-level in IPD meta-analysis part 2: methodological guidance is available (2023)Nonlinear effects and effect …Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome (2023)Calculating the power of a pl…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use (2015)Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ (2016)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data (2013)Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update (2006)Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation (2016)Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach? (2017)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)A comparison of one‐stage vs two‐stage individual patient data meta‐analysis methods: A simulation study (2018)Individual participant data meta‐analysis of intervention studies with time‐to‐event outcomes: A review of the methodology and an applied example (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)Trials number, funding support, and intervention type associated with IPDMA data retrieval: a cross-sectional study (2020)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing mindfulness-based programs for mental health promotion (2023)Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA) (2023)Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects (2023)Quantitative evidence synthesis: a practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences (2023)TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random‐effects meta‐analyses1,082 cited
  • 2001A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome774 cited
  • 2002A simple confidence interval for meta‐analysis424 cited
  • 2006Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data194 cited
  • 2011A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners182 cited
  • 2020Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning180 cited
  • 2015Two-stage Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis and Generalized Forest Plots129 cited
  • 2021Individual Participant Data Meta‐Analysis120 cited
  • 2016One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information115 cited
  • 2018Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis27 cited
  • 2012Using aggregate data to estimate the standard error of a treatment–covariate interaction in an individual patient data meta‐analysis9 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Nonlinear effects and effect modification at the participant-level in IPD meta-analysis part 2: methodological guidance is available

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

7 cited
  • 2023Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome5 cited