SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions
5 references·1 citing·23 second hop
Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions (2022)Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatabil…Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts (2021)Accuracy and reproducibility …Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Accuracy and reliability of f…Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales (2008)Effect of the Number of Respo…Survey of the conclusions drawn of similar footwear cases in various crime laboratories (1996)Survey of the conclusions dra…The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation (1985)The Effect of Number of Ratin…Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners (2024)Accuracy and reproducibility …What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? (1991)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners (2012)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts (2015)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity (1994)Exploring Consumer Behavior in Virtual Reality Tourism Using an Extended Stimulus-Organism-Response Model (2018)A Survey on the Conclusions Drawn on the Same Footwear Marks Obtained in Actual Cases by Several Experts Throughout the World (1999)A Bayesian approach for interpreting shoemark evidence in forensic casework: Accounting for wear features (2011)Footwear Impression Evidence (2017)The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency (2023)On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. (2002)The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels (2010)On exploratory factor analysis: A review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use (2013)Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? (2015)Bloodstain Pattern Analysis with an Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction (2008)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Using the likelihood ratio in bloodstain pattern analysis (2021)Towards a likelihood ratio approach for bloodstain pattern analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales850 cited
  • 2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
  • 1985The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation291 cited
  • 2021Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts45 cited
  • 1996Survey of the conclusions drawn of similar footwear cases in various crime laboratories32 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work