SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections
12 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections (2022)Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but n…Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach (2021)Training early career researc…Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications (2021)Creating clear and informativ…Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)Challenges for assessing repl…Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)Evolution of poor reporting a…Protocols.io: Virtual Communities for Protocol Development and Discussion (2016)Protocols.io: Virtual Communi…Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)Jupyter Notebooks – a publish…A STAR Is Born (2016)A STAR Is BornTime to do something about reproducibility (2014)Time to do something about re…Be careful! Avoiding duplication: a case study (2013)Be careful! Avoiding duplicat…Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility (2013)Announcement: Reducing our ir…The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)The secret lives of experimen…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research (2014)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)A living document: reincarnating the research article (2015)Can cancer researchers accurately judge whether preclinical reports will reproduce? (2017)The challenges of replication (2017)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results (2018)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis (2005)The iPlant Collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for Plant Biology (2011)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Integrating “Big Data” into Aquatic Ecology: Challenges and Opportunities (2017)What is missing in autonomous discovery: open challenges for the community (2023)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi (2024)CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Reproducible image handling and analysis (2021)Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions (2023)Ten simple rules for designing graphical abstracts (2024)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field (2022)Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Analysis: Challenges and Solutions (2022)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2020 update (2020)NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing (2021)Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement (2015)Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility (2016)A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019)Simple changes of individual studies can improve the reproducibility of the biomedical scientific process as a whole (2018)A corpus-based analysis of research article macrostructure patterns (2022)From Methods to Monographs: Fostering a Culture of Research Quality (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2016Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows3,069 cited
  • 2012The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature457 cited
  • 2021Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology308 cited
  • 2013Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility243 cited
  • 2017Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study170 cited
  • 2016Protocols.io: Virtual Communities for Protocol Development and Discussion90 cited
  • 2021Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications75 cited
  • 2016A STAR Is Born56 cited
  • 2014Time to do something about reproducibility44 cited
  • 2013Be careful! Avoiding duplication: a case study22 cited
  • 2021Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work