Citation map · Study

Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies

16 references·1 citing·45 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,145 cited
2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,141 cited
2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
2020A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study685 cited
2015Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model585 cited
2018Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis462 cited
2020Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews384 cited
2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
2019P value–driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses123 cited
2002Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature111 cited
2017Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by