SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interpretation of meta-analyses
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Interpretation of meta-analyses (2022)Interpretation of meta-analysesThe PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidThe Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (2013)Assessing Bias in Studies of …QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Trial sequential analysis may…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,227 cited
  • 2013Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors3,273 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies2,953 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,382 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences1,160 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.