References

• 2019The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals276 cited
• 2004Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial268 cited
• 1998What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?266 cited
• 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited
• 1994Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language158 cited
• 1993The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews150 cited
• 2007The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality139 cited
• 2015Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal125 cited
• 2005Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions125 cited
• 2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
• 1998Effect of Attendance at a Training Session on Peer Reviewer Quality and Performance78 cited
• 2019Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study69 cited
• 2020Quantifying professionalism in peer review68 cited