SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes (2022)Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Sk…Elementary Education Online (2022)Elementary Education OnlineArgument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study (2010)Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a …Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers (2007)Mad City Mystery: Developing …Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview (2007)Argumentation in Science Educ…Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge (2007)Arguing to learn and learning…Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality (2006)Socioscientific Argumentation…From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience (2006)From Content to Context: Vide…The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations (2005)The Quality of Students' Use …TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse (2004)TAPping into argumentation: D…Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science (2004)Enhancing the quality of argu…Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) (2003)Qualitative Research and Eval…Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics (2001)Fostering students' knowledge…Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms (2000)Establishing the norms of sci…Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. (1985)Developing Minds: A Resource …Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative research and eval…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…The Skills of Argument (1991)The Uses of Argument (2003)Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education (2005)Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals (2008)The consequences of modernity (1990)Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity (1994)Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse (2010)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research (2004)Experience and Education (1986)Situated Learning (1991)Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (1994)Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? (2011)Our Princess Is in Another Castle (2012)What Are We Seeking to Sustain Through Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy? A Loving Critique Forward (2014)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research (2013)Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation (1993)A Theory-Based Meta-Analysis of Research on Instruction. (1998)Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom (2005)Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials (2006)Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning (2016)Sustainable Development Goal for Quality Education (SDG 4): A study on SDG 4 to extract the pattern of association among the indicators of SDG 4 employing a genetic algorithm (2022)Teachers’ Beliefs About Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs: a Meta-analytical Study (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1980Qualitative research and evaluation methods35,808 cited
  • 2003Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.)10,488 cited
  • 2000Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms2,328 cited
  • 2004Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science1,564 cited
  • 2004TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse1,406 cited
  • 2001Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics1,346 cited
  • 2006From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience1,091 cited
  • 1985Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking.688 cited
  • 2022Elementary Education Online638 cited
  • 2005The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations632 cited
  • 2007Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview574 cited
  • 2007Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers563 cited
  • 2007Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge544 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality
440 cited
  • 2010Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study418 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.