SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using Chatbots as AI Conversational Partners in Language Learning
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Using Chatbots as AI Conversational Partners in Language Learning (2022)Using Chatbots as AI Conversational Partn…Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives (2022)Exploring AI chatbot affordan…Evaluating User Feedback for an Artificial Intelligence–Enabled, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Mental Health App (Wysa): Qualitative Thematic Analysis (2022)Evaluating User Feedback for …A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots (2022)A Literature Survey of Recent…Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics (2021)Teachers’ attitudes towards c…Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education (2021)Are We There Yet? - A Systema…Using a Chatbot, Replika, to Practice Writing Through Conversations in L2 English (2020)Using a Chatbot, Replika, to …Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing Children's reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner (2020)Same benefits, different comm…Gender Bias in Chatbot Design (2020)Gender Bias in Chatbot DesignLiving up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions (2018)Living up to the chatbot hype…Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence (2018)Chatbot learning partners: Co…An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study (2018)An Empathy-Driven, Conversati…Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners (2017)Stimulating and sustaining in…Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations (2015)Real conversations with artif…Doing Template Analysis (2012)Doing Template AnalysisBots as language learning tools (2006)Bots as language learning too…A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies (2000)A Theoretical Extension of th…The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review (2007)The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words (2009)Sociolinguistic Patterns (2017)AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance (2020)I, Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents (2020)What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry (2021)Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)The theory of planned behavior (1991)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1 (2012)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Scale Development : Theory and Applications (1991)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development (2006)Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery (2019)Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education (2022)The impact of ChatGPT on higher education (2023)The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places (1997)Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers (2000)Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research (2015)Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda (2019)Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. (1993)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? (2014)An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review (2019)Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy (2019)Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being (2023)Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials (1980)Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms (2023)Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT (2023)The Power of Feedback (2007)Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Perception by University Students of the Use of ChatGPT in Education (2023)War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education (2023)Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection (2023)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases (2019)Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions (2019)AI Chatbots in Digital Mental Health (2023)The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning (2004)Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning (2013)Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis (2023)Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions (2024)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)Thematic Analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies24,321 cited
  • 2018Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions1,205 cited
  • 2018An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study1,142 cited
  • 2012Doing Template Analysis996 cited
  • 2015Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations889 cited
  • 2021Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education639 cited
  • 2022A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots594 cited
  • 2022Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives503 cited
  • 2017Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners488 cited
  • 2018Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence470 cited
  • 2021Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics438 cited
  • 2006Bots as language learning tools348 cited
  • 2020Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing Children's reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

178 cited
  • 2020Gender Bias in Chatbot Design99 cited
  • 2022Evaluating User Feedback for an Artificial Intelligence–Enabled, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy–Based Mental Health App (Wysa): Qualitative Thematic Analysis81 cited
  • 2020Using a Chatbot, Replika, to Practice Writing Through Conversations in L2 English19 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.