SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Correction: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
1 references·9 citing·41 second hop
Correction: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2022)Correction: Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics (2025)The ethics of generative AI i…Guidance framework to apply best practices in ecological data analysis: lessons learned from building Galaxy-Ecology (2025)Guidance framework to apply b…Comparative Analysis of Systematic, Scoping, Umbrella, and Narrative Reviews in Clinical Research: Critical Considerations and Future Directions (2025)Comparative Analysis of Syste…So You Want to Do ESM? 10 Essential Topics for Implementing the Experience-Sampling Method (2024)So You Want to Do ESM? 10 Ess…Reproducibility, Replicability and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computing (2024)Reproducibility, Replicabilit…Registered report: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research (2023)Registered report: Survey on …Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size (2023)Power to Detect What? Conside…Peer Review and Scientific Publication at a Crossroads (2023)Peer Review and Scientific Pu…Coupling engagement with analytical rigor: advancing research on religion and entrepreneurship using a mechanism-based approach (2023)Coupling engagement with anal…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)A power primer. (1992)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Empirically Derived Guidelines for Effect Size Interpretation in Social Psychology (2017)A Multi-faceted Mess: A Systematic Review of Statistical Power Analysis in Psychology Journal Articles (2019)Prejudiced interactions with large language models (LLMs) reduce trustworthiness and behavioral intentions among members of stigmatized groups (2025)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Open science practices among authors published in complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)Supporting study registration to reduce research waste (2024)Methodological quality in randomised clinical trials of mental health apps: systematic review and longitudinal analysis (2025)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice (2024)Transparency, bias, and reproducibility across science: a meta-research view (2024)GPT for RCTs? Using AI to determine adherence to clinical trial reporting guidelines (2025)An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Spirituality in social entrepreneurship: an ethical approach to sustainability (2024)Religion and entrepreneurship: a meta-analysis (2025)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows (2017)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived (2002)Ecological Momentary Assessment (2007)Bringing Single-Case Experimental Designs Into Routine Care (2026)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, Methodological Frameworks, and Step‐by‐Step Implementation (2025)Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony (1977)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited

Cited by

  • 2024So You Want to Do ESM? 10 Essential Topics for Implementing the Experience-Sampling Method65 cited
  • 2023Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size58 cited
  • 2025The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics44 cited
  • 2024Reproducibility, Replicability and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computing42 cited
  • 2023Registered report: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research32 cited
  • 2025Comparative Analysis of Systematic, Scoping, Umbrella, and Narrative Reviews in Clinical Research: Critical Considerations and Future Directions24 cited
  • 2023Peer Review and Scientific Publication at a Crossroads23 cited
  • 2023Coupling engagement with analytical rigor: advancing research on religion and entrepreneurship using a mechanism-based approach19 cited
  • 2025Guidance framework to apply best practices in ecological data analysis: lessons learned from building Galaxy-Ecology9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work