Correction: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

John P. A. Ioannidis

99 citations0/0 files storedPLoS Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Publishing and Open Access Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

There is an error in Table 2.A set of parentheses is missing in the equation for Research Finding = Yes and True Relationship = No.Please see the correct Table 2 here.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 99 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Cited by

2024So You Want to Do ESM? 10 Essential Topics for Implementing the Experience-Sampling Method 2023Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size 2025The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics 2024Reproducibility, Replicability and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computing 2023Registered report: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research 2025Comparative Analysis of Systematic, Scoping, Umbrella, and Narrative Reviews in Clinical Research: Critical Considerations and Future Directions 2023Peer Review and Scientific Publication at a Crossroads 2023Coupling engagement with analytical rigor: advancing research on religion and entrepreneurship using a mechanism-based approach

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.