Reasonable Hopes

Abstract

Abstract This chapter argues that one abiding weakness of many attempts by criminologists to come to grips with distinctive and often alarming aspects of contemporary realities is a limited understanding of politics, and in particular of political theory. The increasing institutionalisation of criminology as a ‘discipline’ often serves to exacerbate this tendency. The chapter refers to themes in the work of Tony Bottoms as exemplifying benefits of seeking out a wider range of conceptual resources, including those provided by normative theoretical work. The work of Bottoms and colleagues on problems of legitimacy is a case in point that illuminates central aspects of criminal justice and their relations to problems of contemporary democracies. The chapter goes on to argue that the pragmatist tradition in democratic theory has much to offer students of crime and justice, especially with regard to the complex relations between expert knowledge and programmatic social change. It discusses these claims in light of Dewey’s conception of ‘inquiry’ and Unger’s arguments for ‘empowered democracy’.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.