SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Z-curve 2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates
16 references·12 citing·41 second hop
Z-curve 2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates (2022)Z-curve 2.0: Estimating Replication Rates…Making replication mainstream (2017)Making replication mainstreamEvaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics (2016)Evaluating replicability of l…Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” (2016)Comment on “Estimating the re…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication (2014)The Alleged Crisis and the Il…Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)Publication bias in the socia…The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)The ironic effect of signific…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science (2012)Editors’ Introduction to the …A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories (2012)A Vast Graveyard of Undead Th…Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings (2007)An exploratory test for an ex…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa (1995)Publication Decisions Revisit…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication Decisions and the…A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics (2025)A scoping review on metrics t…The combination of reporting bias and underpowered study designs has substantially exaggerated the motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice and enhanced expectancies: a meta-analysis (2023)The combination of reporting …Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research (2023)Tempest in a teacup: An analy…Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability (2023)Publication bias, statistical…Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size (2023)Power to Detect What? Conside…Assessing the Evidential Value of Mental Fatigue and Exercise Research (2023)Assessing the Evidential Valu…A toolbox to evaluate the trustworthiness of published findings (2023)A toolbox to evaluate the tru…Ten Years of Psychology’s Replicability Crisis: Has the Crisis Been Overcome or Can It be? (unabridged version) (2022)Ten Years of Psychology’s Rep…Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field (2022)Replication concerns in sport…Replicability and the Psychology of Science (2022)Replicability and the Psychol…On the predicted replicability of two decades of experimental research on system justification: A Z‐curve analysis (2022)On the predicted replicabilit…Adjusting for Publication Bias Reveals That Evidence for and Size of Construal Level Theory Effects is Substantially Overestimated (2022)Adjusting for Publication Bia…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? (2015)Mind-Set Interventions Are a Scalable Treatment for Academic Underachievement (2015)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)The Generalizability of Survey Experiments (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management (2017)Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review (2019)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments (2007)A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2020)Financial education affects financial knowledge and downstream behaviors (2021)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder (2010)An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2014Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer1,539 cited
  • 2012Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science1,321 cited
  • 2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,314 cited
  • 1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa964 cited
  • 2007An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings751 cited
  • 2012A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories603 cited
  • 2014The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication597 cited
  • 2017Making replication mainstream478 cited
  • 2016Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”474 cited
  • 2012The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

455 cited
  • 1995Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa453 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field92 cited
    • 2023Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size58 cited
    • 2023Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability45 cited
    • 2023The combination of reporting bias and underpowered study designs has substantially exaggerated the motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice and enhanced expectancies: a meta-analysis42 cited
    • 2022On the predicted replicability of two decades of experimental research on system justification: A Z‐curve analysis28 cited
    • 2022Adjusting for Publication Bias Reveals That Evidence for and Size of Construal Level Theory Effects is Substantially Overestimated25 cited
    • 2023Assessing the Evidential Value of Mental Fatigue and Exercise Research19 cited
    • 2023A toolbox to evaluate the trustworthiness of published findings15 cited
    • 2023Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research14 cited
    • 2022Replicability and the Psychology of Science13 cited
    • 2025A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics13 cited
    • 2022Ten Years of Psychology’s Replicability Crisis: Has the Crisis Been Overcome or Can It be? (unabridged version)1 cited