Notes on Developing Research Review in Urban Planning and Urban Design Based on PRISMA Statement

Hisham Abusaada · Abeer Mohamed Elshater

48 citations0/0 files storedSocial Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Writing and Publishing Urban Planning and Governance

Abstract

The point of view expressed in this article is theoretically grounded in the PRISMA statement, which is a tool for critically evaluating academic papers in public health. Bibliometrics analysis, systematic review, meta-analysis, and storytelling techniques (BSMS) were used to identify relevant studies and create a process for documented urban planning and design research. To promote the construction of new facts based on compelling evidence reported in earlier literature reviews, academics in urban planning and urban design are encouraged to build their own suitable review procedures to support the formation of conclusions based on compelling evidence. Providing a strategic approach and practice process is one of the significant contributions of this knowledge research.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews 2017The Content Analysis Guidebook 2017Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review 2007Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings 2010An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship

Cited by

2023An Umbrella Review of the Best and Most Up-to-Date Evidence on the Built Environment and Physical Activity in Older Adults ≥60 Years 2024Reconceptualizing Proximity Measurement Approaches through the Urban Discourse on the X-Minute City 2024Beyond Keywords: Effective Strategies for Building Consistent Reference Lists in Scientific Research 2024Revisiting Urban Street Planning and Design Factors to Promote Walking as a Physical Activity for Middle-Class Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome in Cairo, Egypt

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.