Disorder-specific impaired neurocognitive function in major depression and generalized anxiety disorder

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are both highly prevalent and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Neurocognitive dysfunction has been commonly found in MDD, but the findings in GAD are inconsistent. Few studies have directly compared cognitive performance between GAD and MDD. Therefore, the present study aimed to reveal the similar and distinct cognitive impairments between both disorders. METHODS: Three non-overlapping and non-comorbid groups were enrolled in the current study including patients with GAD (n = 37), MDD (n = 107) and healthy controls (n = 74). Levels of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) respectively. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) was used to compare the cognitive performance, including sustained attention, visual memory, executive functions and learning. RESULTS: Both MDD and GAD groups demonstrated common significant deficits in sustained attention, visual memory, working memory and learning when compared to healthy controls. Despite the similarities, the MDD group had significantly greater impairment in learning, particularly generalization, while the GAD group demonstrated more pronounced deficits in visual memory. LIMITATIONS: Patients involved were medicated and the sample size for GAD was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: The significant differences in visual memory and learning between MDD and GAD groups might be indicators to distinguishing both disorders. These results confirm that cognitive function is of great importance as a future target for treatment in order to improve wellbeing, quality of life and functionality in both GAD and MDD.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 33 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.