Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies

16 references·2 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
2018Meta-research: Why research on research matters317 cited
2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies248 cited
1998Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals169 cited
2010Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting166 cited
2011A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials151 cited
2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

146 cited

2016Towards evidence based research133 cited

2007Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report129 cited

Cited by

2024Evidence‐based research in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation—Why new studies should rely on earlier work14 cited
2024Reports of randomised control trials should begin and conclude with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant trials: a 25-year audit of the quality of trial reports11 cited