SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills
7 references·11 citing·54 second hop
Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication …Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature (2021)Prevalence of nonsensical alg…Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Digital magic, or the dark ar…Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: an exploratory study (2018)Paraphrasing tools, language …Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement (2018)Integrity of Authorship and P…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Comparing the topological properties of real and artificially generated scientific manuscripts (2015)Comparing the topological pro…The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature (2025)The Citation of Retracted Pap…Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities (2025)Open science and transparency…Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)Using large language models t…The review mills, not just (self-)plagiarism in review reports, but a step further (2024)The review mills, not just (s…Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process (2023)Publishing review reports to …Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology (2023)Paper mills: a novel form of …Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2023)Metadata analysis of retracte…Fake paper identification in the pool of withdrawn and rejected manuscripts submitted to Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2023)Fake paper identification in …Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence (2023)Detection of fake papers in t…Malas prácticas en investigación: las fábricas de manuscritos en Perú (2022)Malas prácticas en investigac…From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection (2022)From plagiarism to scientific…The Numerical Measure of the Success of Predictions (1884)Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists (2009)Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis (2010)Striking similarities between publications from China describing single gene knockdown experiments in human cancer cell lines (2016)Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing (2022)Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts, technologies, and challenges (2023)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)The rise of research networks (2012)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils (2018)Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology (2020)A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations (2023)Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing (2003)English for Academic Purposes (2006)English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book (2006)What are Automated Paraphrasing Tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity (2022)A Review of AI-Powered Writing Tools and Their Implications for Academic Integrity in the Language Classroom (2023)Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Computing Education: Comparative Study for ChatGPT Cases (2024)Publish or impoverish (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)China bans cash rewards for publishing papers (2020)The raw truth about paper mills (2021)Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Is ChatGPT a valid author? (2023)Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities (2024)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)A global exploratory comparison of country self-citations 1996-2019 (2023)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)AI and the advent of the cyborg behavioral scientist (2025)Ideation with Generative AI—in Consumer Research and Beyond (2025)Six Fallacies in Substituting Large Language Models for Human Participants (2025)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)‘As of my last knowledge update’: How is content generated by ChatGPT infiltrating scientific papers published in premier journals? (2024)Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies (2024)Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2020Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?133 cited
  • 2018Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: an exploratory study91 cited
  • 2021Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature83 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2018Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement67 cited
  • 2015Comparing the topological properties of real and artificially generated scientific manuscripts65 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines147 cited
  • 2024The review mills, not just (self-)plagiarism in review reports, but a step further37 cited
  • 2023Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology29 cited
  • 2023Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence27 cited
  • 2025Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities16 cited
  • 2022From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited
  • 2023Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology15 cited
  • 2023Fake paper identification in the pool of withdrawn and rejected manuscripts submitted to Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology15 cited
  • 2025The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature14 cited
  • 2022Malas prácticas en investigación: las fábricas de manuscritos en Perú13 cited
  • 2023Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process10 cited